New Tesla Roadster- 0-60 MPH- 1.9 seconds. 620 mile range.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 66

Thread: New Tesla Roadster- 0-60 MPH- 1.9 seconds. 620 mile range.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    417
    Quote Originally Posted by ths61 View Post
    But should they be forced to do so against their will ? That is the question.

    BHO's list of faltering or bankrupt taxpayer funded green-energy companies:

    Evergreen Solar ($25 million)*
    SpectraWatt ($500,000)*
    Solyndra ($535 million)*
    Beacon Power ($43 million)*
    Nevada Geothermal ($98.5 million)
    SunPower ($1.2 billion)
    First Solar ($1.46 billion)
    Babcock and Brown ($178 million)
    EnerDel’s subsidiary Ener1 ($118.5 million)*
    Amonix ($5.9 million)
    Fisker Automotive ($529 million)
    Abound Solar ($400 million)*
    A123 Systems ($279 million)*
    Willard and Kelsey Solar Group ($700,981)*
    Johnson Controls ($299 million)
    Schneider Electric ($86 million)
    Brightsource ($1.6 billion)
    ECOtality ($126.2 million)
    Raser Technologies ($33 million)*
    Energy Conversion Devices ($13.3 million)*
    Mountain Plaza, Inc. ($2 million)*
    Olsen’s Crop Service and Olsen’s Mills Acquisition Company ($10 million)*
    Range Fuels ($80 million)*
    Thompson River Power ($6.5 million)*
    Stirling Energy Systems ($7 million)*
    Azure Dynamics ($5.4 million)*
    GreenVolts ($500,000)
    Vestas ($50 million)
    LG Chem’s subsidiary Compact Power ($151 million)
    Nordic Windpower ($16 million)*
    Navistar ($39 million)
    Satcon ($3 million)*
    Konarka Technologies Inc. ($20 million)*
    Mascoma Corp. ($100 million)
    I'm not sure, Ths61, but maybe? Don't people often have to be forced to do healthy things against their natural inclinations for the greater good? That's why laws are necessary. It's unfortunate that our natural inclinations don't all lead to the healthiest outcomes, but it seems like that's often the reality of human nature.

    Jason

  2. #2
    Senior Member willtill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    4,622
    Quote Originally Posted by Verismo View Post
    I'm not sure, Ths61, but maybe? Don't people often have to be forced to do healthy things against their natural inclinations for the greater good? That's why laws are necessary. It's unfortunate that our natural inclinations don't all lead to the healthiest outcomes, but it seems like that's often the reality of human nature.

    Jason
    What you may perceive to be healthy, may be unhealthy to me; as it relates to the end game.

    Not all laws are good laws.


    21 years Army (retired)
    ...been everywhere, seen everything, done almost everything.

    IBA 80537

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    417
    Quote Originally Posted by willtill View Post
    What you may perceive to be healthy, may be unhealthy to me; as it relates to the end game.

    Not all laws are good laws.
    That statement's a little broad, Willtill. What do you mean? What's unhealthy about solar powered semi's that can outhaul diesels?

    Jason

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Menomonie, Wi
    Posts
    1,120
    Solar Power sounds good. How ever, producing the batteries, is not so good to the enviornment, or to people. And when these battery operated vehicles crash, and they do, burning and or exploding batteries really sucks to the rescue personel, and the vehicle recovery people. And where are we putting these damaged, leaking "super batteries"?

    Like Willtill, I feel what some perceive as healthy, may be unhealthy to me; as it relates to the end game.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    417
    Quote Originally Posted by jm21ddd15 View Post
    Solar Power sounds good. How ever, producing the batteries, is not so good to the enviornment, or to people. And when these battery operated vehicles crash, and they do, burning and or exploding batteries really sucks to the rescue personel, and the vehicle recovery people. And where are we putting these damaged, leaking "super batteries"?

    Like Willtill, I feel what some perceive as healthy, may be unhealthy to me; as it relates to the end game.
    These complaints sound pretty antiquated. You could almost substitute the same arguments from the time we went from horse drawn carriages to automobiles. "They're so dangerous. I don't trust the technology. When they crash gas is highly flammable and can explode." It sounds like garden variety resistance to change without much reason.

    Jason

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Menomonie, Wi
    Posts
    1,120
    Quote Originally Posted by Verismo View Post
    These complaints sound pretty antiquated. You could almost substitute the same arguments from the time we went from horse drawn carriages to automobiles. "They're so dangerous. I don't trust the technology. When they crash gas is highly flammable and can explode." It sounds like garden variety resistance to change without much reason.

    Jason
    Well, plenty of actual crash videos on line, and fire dept test crashes, showing the difficulties of putting out these type fires. Firefighters must wear masks and respirators. Some of the chemicals in the electric fires cannot be extinguished with water, must use special foams, then must call in Haz-Mat teams for final cleaning of crash sites, etc. That's not "garden variety" resistance. I'm not against progress, but these are real issues.

  7. #7
    Senior Member ths61's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    So Cal
    Posts
    1,815
    Quote Originally Posted by jm21ddd15 View Post
    Well, plenty of actual crash videos on line, and fire dept test crashes, showing the difficulties of putting out these type fires. Firefighters must wear masks and respirators. Some of the chemicals in the electric fires cannot be extinguished with water, must use special foams, then must call in Haz-Mat teams for final cleaning of crash sites, etc. That's not "garden variety" resistance. I'm not against progress, but these are real issues.
    Not to mention the Chevy Volt's spontaneous combustion features.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    417
    Quote Originally Posted by jm21ddd15 View Post
    Well, plenty of actual crash videos on line, and fire dept test crashes, showing the difficulties of putting out these type fires. Firefighters must wear masks and respirators. Some of the chemicals in the electric fires cannot be extinguished with water, must use special foams, then must call in Haz-Mat teams for final cleaning of crash sites, etc. That's not "garden variety" resistance. I'm not against progress, but these are real issues.
    I'm not saying there aren't new adaptations required for electric, jm21. I'm just saying that's always the case with every new thing. Just imagine yourself as a horse drawn carriage passenger who saw your first automobile fire on a road. You'd probably think it was pretty dramatic, and much more dangerous than a carriage, and that would never happen with a carriage. And you'd be right. But would that have been a good enough reason to stem progress? I don't think so then or now.

    Jason

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Harrisonburg, Va
    Posts
    140
    Quote Originally Posted by Verismo View Post
    These complaints sound pretty antiquated. You could almost substitute the same arguments from the time we went from horse drawn carriages to automobiles. "They're so dangerous. I don't trust the technology. When they crash gas is highly flammable and can explode." It sounds like garden variety resistance to change without much reason.

    Jason
    Just curious, how many horses crashed and burned. How many single horse and buggy fatalities were there? I know we'll never know the truth but your sarcastic response is technically true.

    eta. In fact, just this past weekend in my town, a dangerous and highly combustible automobile just sent a young girl on a helicopter ride to a hospital because it struck the horse drawn carriage. Which one is more dangerous?

  10. #10
    Senior Member F6B1911's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Port Huron, MI
    Posts
    1,107
    Quote Originally Posted by jm21ddd15 View Post
    Solar Power sounds good.....
    Yeah, but my solar powered F6B prototype doesn't do very well after dusk!
    And the Wind Turbine prototype keeps getting bent blades from hitting the traffic signals.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •