PDA

View Full Version : Difference between LED bulbs.



Kolsch
06-30-2016, 10:55 AM
Hello forum,

I'm looking into getting LED's for low/high beams. This is all I know that is different between the two.

Electrical connection LED build kit (EC01052) $107.95

SoCal LED headlight kit (SCMG18LED) $145.00

Same quality?
Electrical connection- don't have to modify rubber boot.
The price difference.
SoCal customer service- You can't call them, takes a week to return emails.

Please chim in.
:icon_doh:

bgd8rd
06-30-2016, 11:47 AM
I'm interested in this as well..

CheesyRider
06-30-2016, 11:52 AM
I have the Electrical Connection LEDs in my low beams. I am very satisfied with them. Searching around forums, I've found most folks are happy with EC for low beams, but there are many who don't like them for their high beams. I believe the SoCal has different bulbs for the high beams. So, perhaps they would be a better choice for that application.

Flat6addict
06-30-2016, 12:21 PM
I bought the SOCAL high/Low beam kit, installed both at the same time. Well worth the money, and if you don't drop the adapter ring into your fairing, not a bad install. Use a barbecue skewer to guid the ring into the headlight housing and keep it there till you swing the retaining spring into place.

VERY White, VERY Bright. I dig 'em.

stroguy
06-30-2016, 02:44 PM
I have the Electrical Connection LEDs in my low beams. I am very satisfied with them. Searching around forums, I've found most folks are happy with EC for low beams, but there are many who don't like them for their high beams. I believe the SoCal has different bulbs for the high beams. So, perhaps they would be a better choice for that application.

Well it doesn't make much sense as the only difference in the low and high on the B is the light reflector and lense setup. Both are H7's I believe so the same bulb in low and high supplies the same light energy. It's now up to the lense to disperse that light.

SoCal Rich
06-30-2016, 08:08 PM
I bought the SOCAL high/Low beam kit, installed both at the same time. Well worth the money, and if you don't drop the adapter ring into your fairing, not a bad install. Use a barbecue skewer to guid the ring into the headlight housing and keep it there till you swing the retaining spring into place.

VERY White, VERY Bright. I dig 'em.

Me as well. Love Them!

TailGunner
07-01-2016, 08:54 AM
this is what my buddies and I use. Very, very bright!! Got them on Ebay.

Geronimo
07-01-2016, 12:03 PM
No need to modify the boot with the Socal low beams imo, a little dawn and a drop of water and they squeezed right in.

pilotguy299
07-01-2016, 02:07 PM
Well it doesn't make much sense as the only difference in the low and high on the B is the light reflector and lense setup. Both are H7's I believe so the same bulb in low and high supplies the same light energy. It's now up to the lense to disperse that light.

The SoCal Hi Beam unit is rated higher lumens than the lo beam unit. I think it's 4800 vs 2400.

53driver
07-01-2016, 06:50 PM
LO BEAM: 2400LM-5500K (BRIGHT WHITE) PER BULB
POWER: 12v@1.5AMPS PER BULB

HIGH BEAM: 4800LM-5000K
Power: 12v@2.3AMPS PER BULB

As you can see, the low beams are actually "whiter" by a wee bit (500K) as well.

Hornblower
07-02-2016, 07:22 AM
LO BEAM: 2400LM-5500K (BRIGHT WHITE) PER BULB
POWER: 12v@1.5AMPS PER BULB

HIGH BEAM: 4800LM-5000K
Power: 12v@2.3AMPS PER BULB

As you can see, the low beams are actually "whiter" by a wee bit (500K) as well.

FWIW and IMHO, this is false advertising, especially on the hi beam bulbs. A good ballpark number for LED bulbs is 100 lumens/watt. Using watts = volts X amps, you can do the math. Assuming the amp draw figures are true, the lo beam bulbs may indeed produce around 2100 lumens (with running volts around 14) but the hi beam bulbs would only produce around 3200 lumens at the same voltage, not 4800 lumens. That said, actual lumens at or above 2400 will provide good lighting for down-the-road visibility. Anything greater than that is "gravy".

53driver
07-02-2016, 08:38 AM
FWIW and IMHO, this is false advertising, especially on the hi beam bulbs. A good ballpark number for LED bulbs is 100 lumens/watt. Using watts = volts X amps, you can do the math. Assuming the amp draw figures are true, the lo beam bulbs may indeed produce around 2100 lumens (with running volts around 14) but the hi beam bulbs would only produce around 3200 lumens at the same voltage, not 4800 lumens. That said, actual lumens at or above 2400 will provide good lighting for down-the-road visibility. Anything greater than that is "gravy".

Ken,
You've done more work on/with lights than any three people I know, so your HO is valid in my book.
The "100 lumens per watt" number - what is the limiting feature there? Simply LED technology?

The Low Beam number (@ 14v) would have to be ~115 to get the 2400 lumens.
The High Beam number (@ 14v) would have to be ~150 to get the 4800 lumens.

I might almost buy into the 115 number. That's close enough to "~100" to make it palatable.
But to get to 150 lumens per watt sounds like complete technological revision or, as you mentioned, false advertising.
Unless their amp draw numbers are off.....

I'll be emailing SoCal with some specific questions.

As always, thanks for the lesson my friend.
Cheers,
Steve

stroguy
07-02-2016, 08:44 AM
LO BEAM: 2400LM-5500K (BRIGHT WHITE) PER BULB
POWER: 12v@1.5AMPS PER BULB

HIGH BEAM: 4800LM-5000K
Power: 12v@2.3AMPS PER BULB

As you can see, the low beams are actually "whiter" by a wee bit (500K) as well.

Ah, then the LEDs are spec'd different for hi and low. Very cool.

Hornblower
07-02-2016, 02:47 PM
Ken,
You've done more work on/with lights than any three people I know, so your HO is valid in my book.
The "100 lumens per watt" number - what is the limiting feature there? Simply LED technology?

The Low Beam number (@ 14v) would have to be ~115 to get the 2400 lumens.
The High Beam number (@ 14v) would have to be ~150 to get the 4800 lumens.

I might almost buy into the 115 number. That's close enough to "~100" to make it palatable.
But to get to 150 lumens per watt sounds like complete technological revision or, as you mentioned, false advertising.
Unless their amp draw numbers are off.....

I'll be emailing SoCal with some specific questions.

As always, thanks for the lesson my friend.
Cheers,
Steve

Yes, Steve, the lumens/watt number is a function of technological development. CREE is probably the leader in this industry and has been offering LED's with an efficacy of 100 lumens/watt for some time now. Of course, this number continues to rise and, without looking it up, CREE has recently gone beyond that probably somewhere in the range of 125 lumens/watt. This number will vary with the particular LED and it also depends on how hard the LED is driven (a function of the current limiting design of the driver). Drive it too hard and life suffers. Due to that, I personally wouldn't want to count on anything over 100 lumens/watt and frankly, I'd be surprised if we even get that. As I've said many times before, most suppliers of LED's misrepresent the facts so we need to take, with a grain of salt, the color temp, the wattage, the lumens, and even the amp draw. I have a clip-on ammeter that I have used to confirm the amps and it has led to more than one "revelation". I suppose what's happening here is that when most of the LED suppliers are lying about their product, the remaining suppliers have to play that game as well. Otherwise, their specs will look weak by comparison. What I do put stock in are the specs listed by the manufacturer (not the supplier or seller). Once I know the particular CREE element being used in a bulb, I go to the CREE site to see what the true specs are. I do NOT rely on the supplier for that. Even then, the supplier may be lying about the CREE element in their bulb. It's indeed a tricky matter. In the end, maybe all we need to be concerned with is the quantity and quality of the light produced by a bulb. So, when we find one that performs well, we need to let others know which, more or less, is the thrust of this thread.