PDA

View Full Version : Why a private email server?



Davidk
08-03-2016, 11:50 AM
I could not understand why the Hilderbeast would spend the money, effort and risk to set up her own server.

Surprise! (not) Turns out that private servers are immune to Freedom of Information Act requests. If I were a lying, cheating, incompetent, treasonous bitch, i would set one up also.

EDIT - Nevermind, new guidance has proven me wrong

F6B1911
08-03-2016, 02:42 PM
I could not understand why the Hilderbeast would spend the money, effort and risk to set up her own server.

That is really the only question that the FBI director needed to ask.

BIGLRY
08-03-2016, 04:00 PM
I could not understand why the Hilderbeast would spend the money, effort and risk to set up her own server.

Surprise! (not) Turns out that private servers are immune to Freedom of Information Act requests. If I were a lying, cheating, incompetent, treasonous bitch, i would set one up also.
Dave, Ya might want to check that out more throughly and maybe walk back that statement due to this D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling Tuesday that e-mails on private servers are indeed subject to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests.

“We agree with plaintiff-appellant that an agency cannot shield its records from search or disclosure under FOIA by the expedient of storing them in a private email account controlled by the agency head,” the court held.

Read the D.C. Circuit’s full decision https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/75450CA390CB52C985257FE7005038BD/$file/15-5128-1622973.pdf

Here is a little more.
The D.C. Circuit held:
"If a department head can deprive the citizens of their right to know what his department is up to by the simple expedient of maintaining his departmental emails on an account in another domain, that purpose is hardly served. It would make as much sense to say that the department head could deprive requestors of hard-copy documents by leaving them in a file at his daughter’s house and then claiming that they are under her control."


Score one for the good guys:icon_lol:

Davidk
08-03-2016, 04:18 PM
Dave, Ya might want to check that out more throughly and maybe walk back that statement due to this D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling Tuesday that e-mails on private servers are indeed subject to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests.

“We agree with plaintiff-appellant that an agency cannot shield its records from search or disclosure under FOIA by the expedient of storing them in a private email account controlled by the agency head,” the court held.

Read the D.C. Circuit’s full decision https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/75450CA390CB52C985257FE7005038BD/$file/15-5128-1622973.pdf

Here is a little more.
The D.C. Circuit held:
"If a department head can deprive the citizens of their right to know what his department is up to by the simple expedient of maintaining his departmental emails on an account in another domain, that purpose is hardly served. It would make as much sense to say that the department head could deprive requestors of hard-copy documents by leaving them in a file at his daughter’s house and then claiming that they are under her control."


Score one for the good guys:icon_lol:


Never mind....My bad, but she's still a lying, cheating, corrupt bitch.

BIGLRY
08-03-2016, 04:33 PM
Never mind....My bad, but she's still a lying, cheating, corrupt bitch.Oh come on Dave tell us how you really feel about that lower than a snake in a wagon wheel rut, two faced felonious, treasonous, whining, conniving Marxist, unapologetic, boastful, self-opinionated, treacherous sad excuse of a human being?

https://westernrifleshooters.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/fat-lady-singing.jpg

Davidk
08-03-2016, 04:50 PM
Oh come on Dave tell us how you really feel about that lower than a snake in a wagon wheel rut, two faced felonious, treasonous, whining, conniving Marxist, unapologetic, boastful, self-opinionated, treacherous sad excuse of a human being?

https://westernrifleshooters.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/fat-lady-singing.jpg


You forgot "corrupt."

BIGLRY
08-03-2016, 05:36 PM
You forgot "corrupt."Why yes...yes I did so to make up for it, here is what Clinton really stands for.
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/c6/2b/6d/c62b6dd5689d9566f50b01585dfb81c0.jpg

Steve 0080
08-03-2016, 07:00 PM
WOW!!! Remind me to never get on Larry's bad side !!! :stirthepot:

BIGLRY
08-03-2016, 09:34 PM
WOW!!! Remind me to never get on Larry's bad side !!! :stirthepot:
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/8b/54/59/8b545970427d6ef3f857cf7055ad4e18.jpg

And this pisses me off.

http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/hclinton-nodding_zps3be9c096.gif

stroguy
08-03-2016, 09:36 PM
Wicked callous human.