Tucker Carlson spanks Bill Nye and the crazy global warming hoax

[dadeo]

C02 not good for you? You do understand without it life doesn't even exist. If you have quotes from actual scientists who said that, talk about stupid. If you believe the planet has ever been in an ice age, use your logic to explain how earth came out of it. The path to hell is always paved with good intentions so no, please don't encourage any government to hunt unicorns on my dime.

What a stupid uneducated biased response. Your statement is almost verbatum out of the denier handbook, courtesy of the Koch Bros.

If CO2 is so good for you, why don't you try breathing it at high concentrations sometime?

CO2 is necessary for PLANT life, and plants don't need more than VERY LOW LOW LEVELS in our atmosphere. Like less thn 1%. At higher concentrations IT IS POISON. You can't breath it at a certain level and its greenhouse effect is well docmnented in experiments, and has been for 100+ years.

If you If don't think CO2 can be harmful to human health at pretty low levels, ask the guys in who rode Apollo 13 back to earth, who had to figure out away to filter CO2 out of the ship. (You DO believe that Americans went to the moon don't you?) Note: they had plenty of oxygen. CO2 was the issue.

Like I said in my original post: Deniers would rather risk our future than take reasonable acts to reduce pollution and make our planet healthier. I'd rather risk paying now to reduce our use of coal, gas and other polluting fuels in favor of solar, wind, and yes even nuclear power (if we can fitgure out how do so safely). Deniers are not conservatives, not in the traditional, historic sense of the word. They are stupid.

[ths61]

What do you think makes O2 and why does it REQUIRE CO2 ? It used to be common knowledge for school children that O2 and CO2 was the cycle of life here on planet Earth. Ever notice how Glow-Bull-Warmin's fanatics now use the term "CARBON FOOTPRINT" instead of "CO2 FOOTPRINT"? It is to make public erroneously think CO2 is actually poison, like carbon monoxide (CO), which it is not.

Here is some more information on Glow-Bull-Warmin's CHIEF PROFIT (with an f $$$, not a prophet).

"... Al Gore's used over 20 times more energy to power his [Nashville, TN] home for a year than the average American, according to a report published on Wednesday. [NOTE: This does NOT include his other properties or vehicles.]

The National Center for Public Policy Research reported that Gore's Nashville home used a total of 230,889 kilowatt hours of electricity from August 2016 to July 2017. The average U.S. residential utility customer used 10,812 kWh in 2015, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. ..."

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/al...rticle/2630475

What a stupid uneducated biased response. Your statement is almost verbatum out of the denier handbook, courtesy of the Koch Bros.

If CO2 is so good for you, why don't you try breathing it at high concentrations sometime?

CO2 is necessary for PLANT life, and plants don't need more than VERY LOW LOW LEVELS in our atmosphere. Like less thn 1%. At higher concentrations IT IS POISON. You can't breath it at a certain level and its greenhouse effect is well docmnented in experiments, and has been for 100+ years.

If you If don't think CO2 can be harmful to human health at pretty low levels, ask the guys in who rode Apollo 13 back to earth, who had to figure out away to filter CO2 out of the ship. (You DO believe that Americans went to the moon don't you?) Note: they had plenty of oxygen. CO2 was the issue.

Like I said in my original post: Deniers would rather risk our future than take reasonable acts to reduce pollution and make our planet healthier. I'd rather risk paying now to reduce our use of coal, gas and other polluting fuels in favor of solar, wind, and yes even nuclear power (if we can fitgure out how do so safely). Deniers are not conservatives, not in the traditional, historic sense of the word. They are stupid.

[dadeo]

blah, blah, blah yeah, we all know how you feel about Al Gore.

Any one with a clue knows that nobody's breathing CO2 but plants. And anyone who went to college and/or took a basic earth science course knows that CO2 is natuarally less than 1% of the atmosphere, but its been rising rapidly in the last 100 years. And coincidentially (?) temps seem to be rising too.

If I am wrong we have have wasted billions of dollars. If you are wrong, your grandkids will be spending trillions and will be really screwed, not to mention likely loss of life. But why should you care? You won't be around. You obviously prefer to put your grandchildren at risk than inconvience yourself today to reduce or prevent what most scientists see coming. Your shelfishness and shortsidedness is showing.

As I said, its impossible to change a Denier's mind. They just don't want to listen. You are no better than the morons who don't believe that men went to the moon in 1969-1972.

[ths61]

I am afraid you are worshiping a Glow-Bull-Warmins FALSE PROFIT. Feel free to give him all of your $$$ to the global scam, but not mine.

With no CO2, there would be no O2 and then where would your grandkids be ? Without plants and plankton, your grandkids would have no food.

FYI, BHO has already blown BILLION$$$ of taxpayer money on green energy fraud and political kickbacks. The total economic cost of the Paris Climate Accord to the U.S. would approach $3 trillion in lost gross domestic product and 6.5 million industrial jobs. I hope you do realize it is a scam.

Obama’s Forced Taxpayer-Backed Green Energy Failures

The complete list of faltering or bankrupt green-energy companies:

Evergreen Solar ($25 million)*
SpectraWatt ($500,000)*
Solyndra ($535 million)*
Beacon Power ($43 million)*
Nevada Geothermal ($98.5 million)
SunPower ($1.2 billion)
First Solar ($1.46 billion)
Babcock and Brown ($178 million)
EnerDel’s subsidiary Ener1 ($118.5 million)*
Amonix ($5.9 million)
Fisker Automotive ($529 million)
Abound Solar ($400 million)*
A123 Systems ($279 million)*
Willard and Kelsey Solar Group ($700,981)*
Johnson Controls ($299 million)
Brightsource ($1.6 billion)
ECOtality ($126.2 million)
Raser Technologies ($33 million)*
Energy Conversion Devices ($13.3 million)*
Mountain Plaza, Inc. ($2 million)*
Olsen’s Crop Service and Olsen’s Mills Acquisition Company ($10 million)*
Range Fuels ($80 million)*
Thompson River Power ($6.5 million)*
Stirling Energy Systems ($7 million)*
Azure Dynamics ($5.4 million)*
GreenVolts ($500,000)
Vestas ($50 million)
LG Chem’s subsidiary Compact Power ($151 million)
Nordic Windpower ($16 million)*
Navistar ($39 million)
Satcon ($3 million)*
Konarka Technologies Inc. ($20 million)*
Mascoma Corp. ($100 million)

[ths61]

It has to hurt when the critic's book that debunks your Glow-Bull-Wamins diatribe is outselling your sacred fabricated text.

Climatologist Calls Out 'False Claims' & 'Erroneous Information' in New Al Gore Film

"... Blaming naturally occurring events on mankind ..."

http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/09/0...st-roy-spencer

[taxfree4]

Prediction:
http://scienceline.org/2008/12/ask-r...venient-truth/

Inconvenient Truth @20 foot rise in sea levels, IPCC 2 feet rise in sea levels

Truth:

https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-07-...ia-silent.html

Goreisms:

"In particular, we have vastly increased the amount of carbon dioxide--the most important of the so-called greenhouse gases." (p. 25)

While "most important" is a subjective term, the implication that most of the existing greenhouse effect is due to CO2 is false: water vapor is the source of most of the existing greenhouse effect.

"The problem we now face is that this thin layer of atmosphere is being thickened by huge quantities of human-caused carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases." (p. 27)

The Earth's atmosphere is not thicker as a result of increased greenhouse gases; rather, the effects of changes in these gases are associated with the different absorptive properties of these minor constituents.

"We have already begun to see the kind of heatwaves that scientists say will become much more common if global warming is not addressed. In the summer of 2003 Europe was hit by a massive heatwave that killed 35,000 people." (p. 75)

This death toll is dominated by 14,082 deaths in France and 4,000 in Italy, both calculated by comparing observed deaths in August 2003 to what would "normally be expected" (UNEP, 2004); these deaths, predominantly among the elderly, have not been individually attributed to heat-related causes. The French government in particular offered these precise estimates after initially stating that there was no accurate way of measuring deaths from the heat.

"There has also been record flooding in China, which, as one of the planet's oldest civilizations, keeps the best flood records of any nation in the world." (p. 112)

Jiang et al., 2005, examined Chinese flood records for the Yangtze Delta from 1000 AD to the present and found the frequency of large floods was greatest from about 1500 to 1700


"A new scientific study shows that, for the first time, polar bears have been drowning in significant numbers." (p. 147)
The "significant numbers" are four drowned polar bears observed in 2004

"Once the sea-based ice shelf was gone, the land-based ice... began to shift and fall into the sea... This is one of the reasons sea levels have been rising worldwide..." (p. 184)

Current sea level rise, estimated at 2.8 centimeters per decade, is mostly attributed to thermal expansion of the oceans.

I could go on and on but you get the picture. People like "lazy news" where at dinner parties, get togethers, or forums, spout a headline here or a catch phrase there, however, those of us who like facts and data can refute their junk science every single time. When you do it becomes personal for obvious reasons - they have no data on their side. No sea levels rising, no spiking and sustained temperatures, Greenland not melting and no cataclysmic happenings ONLY predictions. Environmental boogey men that hide behind that tree they're hugging to spout the cause-du-jour to make themselves FEEL important, superior and likable to their like-minded buddies. One thing-that shit don't work here, unfortunately for them the majority of F6B owners are comprised of intellectuals who don't fall for this bullshit. Your best bet is to peddle this bullshit somewhere else as it IS falling on deaf ears. The only guys to buy this stuff are hipsters, metrosexuals and those, like pro-abortion guys, who need to or else they won't get laid.

[ths61]

If California is such a GREEN STATE controlled by the GREEN SUPER-MAJORITY D'RAT party, why is 8 of the 10 most polluted cities in the USA located in California under GREEN D'RAT control with the most regulation, restrictions, taxes and fees ???

Kind of makes you wonder if you think about it. Can you say SCAM ???



https://www.theatlantic.com/internat...ective/360868/

[dadeo]

Like I said there is no convincing the Denier.. You'd rather listen to Koch and the coal polluters. You'd rather continue to pollute, and put your kids at risk, post stupid cartoons, and listen to those whose current business model is at risk from cutting gas, oil and coal use.

You and I will not ever know which of us is right. But consider this: If we continue on the path we are on, and global warming is happening, our kids are screwed. If you are right and we reduced coal, gas and oil use, we still have cleaner air for our kids. What do we lose by cutting oil, gas, and coal use? A few dirty jobs? A slightly bigger tax bill?

But you'd rather risk our kids.

You prefer dirty air from gasoline, coal and oil energy burnig.

Looks like you are winning the political war in the USA, but the rest of the world is going to move out in front of us with advanced no polluting energy. If we are lucky the USA will benefit from being a free loader, as the rest of the world cleans up the air, but as the rest of the world modeninzes, we will be left behind with high polluting infrastructure and costs.

Yeah, but you prefer risking your kids. And you prefer taking a risk that the USA be poorer and dirtier in the future instead of investing modenizing its energy production into clean sources.

Sounds pretty stupid to me, but I am a kind of risk averse when it comes to global disaster.

[dadeo]

OH, the girl is kind of hot in a stanky sort way. Thanks for that!