F6B where's the weight?
GoldWingHIDS
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 30

Thread: F6B where's the weight?

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Location
    Malta
    Posts
    35

    F6B where's the weight?

    Hello, just thinking, with no real point, where's the weight in the F6B?
    I mean it's all plastic even the gas tank with an aluminum frame.
    The forks, wheels and tyres are common in size/weight to a lot of bikes. When I had the rear wheel off recently it didn't seem particularly heavy.
    So where are all those lbs hiding? Is it all in the engine.

  2. #2
    Senior Member shortleg0521's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    fredrick. maryland
    Posts
    1,126
    Ever try to lift a goldwing motor?
    That and all other parts add up brothers her.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Location
    Malta
    Posts
    35
    Yep, searched around and there are figures of 274 lbs for the engine. No scope for any weight loss that I can see.

  4. #4
    Senior Member F6Dave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Elizabeth, Colorado
    Posts
    515
    The rest of the drive train isn't light, either. The massive forks and stout swingarm and final drive assemblies have to add some serious weight. But for all the weight, with such a low C.G. it handles very well for a large motorcycle. And the mileage isn't bad either. Last month at the Valkyrie rally in Taos I routinely got over 50 MPG with all the low speed sightseeing. I even got 64 MPG on one tank. That was a high point for any motorcycle I've ever owned.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    95
    I've gotten that 50+ mileage a few times. When I ride with the OFC. Old Farts Club.

  6. #6
    Senior Member olegoat345's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Central, Fl.
    Posts
    1,223
    The best thing about the GW / F6B's weight is that it's low, really low, compared to say a V-twin. The engine, tranny, rear drive, fuel tank are almost even with the axles. Makes handling great. Smart move Honda!

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Olympia, WA
    Posts
    74
    I wouldn't mind the 875+ lbs... and would accept a few more lbs IF they had put a Reverse on the scoot!

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Wa
    Posts
    49
    OlyF6B, I agree. Use the reverse on my Wing a few times a week, there are times it would be handy on the B/ But with so few comforts compared to Wings, I'm just happy for cruise and heated grips, use them a lot.

  9. #9
    Senior Member F6Dave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Elizabeth, Colorado
    Posts
    515
    Quote Originally Posted by olegoat345 View Post
    The best thing about the GW / F6B's weight is that it's low, really low, compared to say a V-twin. The engine, tranny, rear drive, fuel tank are almost even with the axles. Makes handling great. Smart move Honda!
    Agreed, an opposed cylinder layout works great in a motorcycle. They're smooth, easy to maintain, and have a very low C.G. And the old airhead BMWs were cooled very well with the cylinders sticking out in the wind. I'm surprised flat engine layouts aren't more popular. I think the only motorcycle companies using it are Honda, BMW, and Ural. Porsche and Subaru are the only cars. Am I missing any?

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    346
    Quote Originally Posted by F6Dave View Post
    Agreed, an opposed cylinder layout works great in a motorcycle. They're smooth, easy to maintain, and have a very low C.G. And the old airhead BMWs were cooled very well with the cylinders sticking out in the wind. I'm surprised flat engine layouts aren't more popular. I think the only motorcycle companies using it are Honda, BMW, and Ural. Porsche and Subaru are the only cars. Am I missing any?
    Harley came out with one during WW2 to compete with z Germans, but only made a thousand of them and scrapped it after the American military went with the Jeep. It ran a hundred degrees cooler than their twins. It's a bummer to think about what might've been had they continued the ingenuity, instead of banking on brand loyalty.

    Jason

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •