Calling all mechanical engineers
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Calling all mechanical engineers

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Don't mess with my 'pepper' Scotrod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Houston Tejas
    Posts
    2,752
    The engines relationship to the frame has virtually ~nothing~ to do with smoothness. The opposed cylinder design is what does it.

    There is also an opposed cylinder opposed piston design out there than looks interesting;

    http://www.ecomotors.com/

    Turbo 2 stroke. Power to weight/power to size ratio (power density) and efficiency are both very impressive.

    The technology of Opposed pistons isn't 'new',,, the diesel engines in some of Germanys WW2-era balloons had a similar design in the Junkers Jumo 205 aircraft engine:

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...cutview_02.jpg

    The OPOC looks like it's getting support from / going to be built in China:

    http://www.motorauthority.com/news/1...built-in-china

    http://www.greencarreports.com/news/...piston-engines

    The piston-equipped engine, as we know it, is long overdue for a refresh,,,

  2. #2
    Senior Member 4DI2D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Keizer, Oregon
    Posts
    286
    BMW's boxer seems to have started something.
    Volkswagen's opposed four and the original Wing design differed mostly in cooling.
    In the Forties the first helicopter engines were air-cooled opposed sixes specifically to reduce vibration in the airframe.

    Honda didn't do anything new . . . they just did it BETTER!

  3. #3
    Thank all of you for the great information.

    Riding a Goldwing is like opening a can of testosterone.
    Go Green - Recycle Congress!!!!

  4. #4
    Senior Member smokinjoe187's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    anaheim California
    Posts
    477
    Quote Originally Posted by Retired Army View Post
    Thank all of you for the great information.
    now lets work on world peace!

  5. #5
    Don't mess with my 'pepper' Scotrod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Houston Tejas
    Posts
    2,752
    It takes a little while for the gif file to load, but here's how the OPOC engine works:

    http://www.ecomotors.com/sites/defau...block-loop.gif

    Great balance, piston speed cut in half compared to a 'conventional' piston engine of equal size (less wear, less drag, capable of higher rpms)

  6. #6
    Don't mess with my 'pepper' Scotrod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Houston Tejas
    Posts
    2,752
    The OPOC Advantage
    The OPOC engine could represent the next generation in diesel technology, and its advancement may prove as potent to diesel performance as turbocharging, intercooling, and direct injection werecombined. EcoMotors promises its engine:
    1. Uses 50 percent less parts and is projected to be much cheaper to make than today’s engines
    2. Has no cylinder head or valvetrain to cause problems
    3. Is capable of 15 to 50 percent better fuel economy
    4. Does not create excess waste heat, so the need for a large cooling system is reduced
    5. Creates fewer exhaust emissions, which negates the need for expensive exhaust aftertreatments


    Navistar Ecomotors Diesel Engine Side Shot

    Inside Navistar’s Diesel Of The Future
    Manufacturer: EcoMotors
    Location: Allen Park, Michigan
    Engine: EM100
    Type: Two-stroke, opposed-piston opposed-cylinder (OPOC) turbodiesel
    Cylinder bore: 3.937 inches (100 mm)
    Dry weight: 296 pounds
    Dimensions: 22.8L x 41.3W x 18.5H in.

    Horsepower: 325 hp at 3,500 rpm
    Torque: 664 lb-ft at 2,100 rpm
    Power density: 1.1 hp per pound


    Read more: http://www.dieselpowermag.com/tech/1...#ixzz31wIa4fHJ

    664 ft lbs from a 2 cylinder w/4 inch bore's??!!??? YEAH BABY!!!!!

  7. #7
    Senior Member MarcPW's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    259
    Do you know that originally the plan for the first GW (GW1000cc) was based on a flat six as we have today, but the ingeneers deemed it as too soon for this kind of technology, that it will scare motorcyclists away from Honda, so decided on a 4 cylinders... Honda created this 1000 cc just to beat Kawazaki who just made a 900cc motorcycle. (I forgot the model)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •