Tire sizes
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Tire sizes

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    shooter
    Guest
    I don't know what pressure you were running in the G. Two up and one up 45 seems great to me and I drag the pegs frequently one up. I just put the Alpin on and got a short ride in weekend before last. I'm at 42 and I'm going to 40. Its a little harsh riding at 42. I've been riding the front at 40 also. May end up at 40 for both ends. That runflat is stiff. Sidewall feels three times thicker. It us two plies vs one ply on the G. Weather has been too bad for a good ride.

  2. #2
    Moderator bob109's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Citra Fl.
    Posts
    2,009
    Quote Originally Posted by shooter View Post
    I don't know what pressure you were running in the G. Two up and one up 45 seems great to me and I drag the pegs frequently one up. I just put the Alpin on and got a short ride in weekend before last. I'm at 42 and I'm going to 40. Its a little harsh riding at 42. I've been riding the front at 40 also. May end up at 40 for both ends. That runflat is stiff. Sidewall feels three times thicker. It us two plies vs one ply on the G. Weather has been too bad for a good ride.
    For the Alpine 32/34 psi should be "golden" only because of the stiff sidewalls

  3. #3
    Senior Member bobbyf6b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    2,482
    I never got my Gmax up to 45. I had it at 40. I decided to wait until I wear out my MT to play with it more. I sold it just so it wouldn't sit around and I found a F6B rear wheel this time. The Gmax was on a regular Wing wheel.

    I don't remember hearing any feedback from the buyer of my Gmax. He's a member here but doesn't post a lot. I hope it's working out for him.

  4. #4
    shooter
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by bob109 View Post
    For the Alpine 32/34 psi should be "golden" only because of the stiff sidewalls
    Bob that's easy to say but with my 290 lbs and the wife at 180 its a pretty good load. Whereas you ran 42 in the G that was squirrelly for me. I'll drop 2lbs at a time till it feels right.

  5. #5
    Moderator bob109's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Citra Fl.
    Posts
    2,009
    Quote Originally Posted by shooter View Post
    Bob that's easy to say but with my 290 lbs and the wife at 180 its a pretty good load. Whereas you ran 42 in the G that was squirrelly for me. I'll drop 2lbs at a time till it feels right.
    Hell ! I'm a puny 240 Adjusting downward in 2lb. increments should get you to a "sweet spot"

  6. #6
    Junior Member mike neal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    18

    185/55-16

    My brother and I both ride with the CT on the back. He likes the 195 because of the footprint and rollout is very similar to the OEM MC tire. I also put about 18k miles on the 195 Hankook but found it to be a bit squirmy due to lack of sidewall stiffness and that was with 41psi.
    However, while at the local Gateway tire store I spotted the 185/55-16 Yokohama. Purchased one and mounted it up. Balanced with only one small weight. 40psi Nitrogen and the sidewall stiffness is very similar to the MC tire (probably due to less sidewall height. Rollout is a bit less and it looks like I gained about 150 rpm at 75mph but the stability and stick to road seat of the pants feel is amazing. We ride pretty hard and will drag the pegs when given the opportunity but this tire should still give 30k plus miles of hard riding based on initial wear measurements. The added bonus is the unbelievable grip and stability in the rain which I attribute in part to being slightly more narrow than the 195 CT. It should also be noted that I have the BT-45 mounted up front with correct rotation arrow to sipe the water away.

    Anyway, this is just another choice for those who may be considering the CT alternative. Oh last but not least, the 185 with the smaller rollout will give you better acceleration in third, fourth and fifth gear. Not head turning turbo feel but just that added pop without paying anything additional for chips or pipes. As always, do not take this as advice to run or not run a CT. This is just my personal experience based on actual miles with the CT mounted up.
    Take care my friends and ride safe.
    Mike Neal

  7. #7
    Senior Member hiflyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Oklahoma City, OK
    Posts
    1,282
    Quote Originally Posted by bob109 View Post
    For the Alpine 32/34 psi should be "golden" only because of the stiff sidewalls
    34 psi on my Alpine is saweeet. 215 pounds in the saddle.

  8. #8
    Senior Member valkmc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Ocala Fl.
    Posts
    514
    Quote Originally Posted by hiflyer View Post
    34 psi on my Alpine is saweeet. 215 pounds in the saddle.
    I have my Alpin at 38 psi. Feels right for me.

  9. #9
    Senior Member smokinjoe187's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    anaheim California
    Posts
    477
    i'm running 40 and 40...seems to work good for me...6 1 290 lbs...daily driver

  10. #10
    Senior Member yabiah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Phoenix, Az
    Posts
    188

    G-Max Update 28March2015

    Due to the the weak side wall I've been running mine at 45-47psi.
    I think I have the rear shock preload at 10. Or was it 14?
    I'm trying to find the sweet spot between shock preload and psi.

    I did a spirited 560+ miles yesterday and all was well.
    High speed sweepers at and above 90 were solid! First and second gear switchbacks are a tad quirky.
    Anything regular, 5-10 over posted, all road conditions couldn't affect the solidity of the G-Max.

    If you haven't already, you can view my previous Darkside experience here: http://www.hdforums.com/forum/wheels...-darkside.html
    Tim

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •