I tell my managers and supervisors dissent is a good thing. Who wants to work with a bunch of neutered sheep?
I tell my managers and supervisors dissent is a good thing. Who wants to work with a bunch of neutered sheep?
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
2015 F6B Deluxe
Matte Silver
I am starting to like this guy. Nice to have a breathe of fresh air; once someone opens the window and some of us meekly venture to it to look out.
Of course I oversimplified it... but you all get my point.
Post on.... Adventurous1
Maybe we'll see you at our upcoming rally in Russellvile. Make plans now if you can attend.
21 years Army (retired)
...been everywhere, seen everything, done almost everything.
IBA 80537
Mr. "I don't pay withholding" better be buying drinks for the "we did pay withholding" crowd in Russellville or there'll be some explainin' to do.
It'd be my pleasure to buy a round......and I'd be honored. See the extra $$$ keeps the economy rolling.
Not a big beer guy but do like stopping into local breweries I pass along the way and tasting the local flair . (or is it flare? Always get confused on those 2). Tasting a locally brewed ice cold frosty and sipping finely aged tequila. Light up a Cuban, and now we're talkin'.
Hey, perhaps that's a good thread. Best local breweries. Hmmmm......
Any thoughts of how we could join in this effort in not paying or have we been in the system to long to start not paying ???
" Truth is often deemed rude, blunt and to the point which is why so few make their friend " Freddy Hayler ..352-267-1553 Sanford, FLA Gutterman6000@Gmail.com
If you're working as an "employee" who's filled out both an I-9 and a W-2 w/ a Tax ID # (SSN), then unfortunately you've already admitted to your payor that you're a 'taxpayer' (one word term defined by Congress), and thus you're liable and/or subject to the rules /codes / statutes outlined in title 26 USC and 26 CFR.
There is a rumor/legend floating around work that somebody thru a long legal battle did find a way to stop paying. Supposedly as part of the settlement with the gov he was under a gag order not to discuss it with others...Since I work for the gov I take it with a grain of salt, however I know truth is stranger than fiction and as adventurous1 said nobody bothers to read.
Ok, looked over the court document, and something seems askew. Forget all the mumbo jumbo Federal Zone, and whatever else I don't understand, here's my confusion; If a Fed Judge ordered a permanent injunction about 10 yrs ago against that dude, that dude's website and that dude's materials he's selling - why are those links still activated and working? If there's a permanent injunction why is he allowed to still sell his products? The court would have ordered the web host to shut it down, yes? Also, did you see where the Plaintiff (the feds) wanted the Court to dismiss the Defendant's Right to a Jury Trial - and the court said ok? The Court denied the Citizen his Right to a Trial by Jury? Say it ain't so Joe. There's no way the Fed's would allow a Citizen to ignore a 'permanent injunction' for 10 yrs. Was it appealed and he won?
21 years Army (retired)
...been everywhere, seen everything, done almost everything.
IBA 80537